If the accused agreed, as part of a declassification agreement, to appear before the district court on the “dates to be determined” and to answer for his actions at the “hours to be determined” and not to appear voluntarily on the last day of the trial, his violation of the release agreement was not excused by his presence on other days of the trial. State v. Phillips, 84 Gold App 316, 734 P2d 4 (1987), Sup Ct Refused Verification (2) (a) In addition to the conditions set out in subsection (1) of this section, if the defendant is charged with an offence that also constitutes spousal violence, the court must be considered a condition of the release agreement that the defendant is not related to the victim of the abuse. (a) against one of the provisions of the release agreement imposed pursuant to ORS 135.260; or accused who have left the courtroom after the conviction while awaiting, are detained, and those who have not returned, violate the legal terms and conditions of the release agreement. State v. Johnson, 66 Gold App 123, 672 P2d 1249 (1983) (1) The line manager of an accused on parole, who knowingly assists the defendant in the violation of his parole or knowingly ignores the accused`s offence, is punished with contempt. (c) Where notification and opportunity have been given to the defendant to be heard, the Tribunal includes, where appropriate, in the agreement, sufficient conditions and findings to the 18 U.S.C dd) (8) and (8) (8) to impair the defendant`s ability to possess firearms and ammunition or to engage in activities with firearms. (d) ORS 107.720 (execution of enforcement orders) applies to authorization agreements executed by accused accused of domestic violence, except that proof of notification of the release contract is not necessary and that, at the request of the victim, the agreement cannot be terminated without being heard. [1973 c.836 No 150; 1991 c.111 No. 10; 1993 c.731 No. 6; 1999 v.617 No 3; 2013 ca.151 no 2] 1. The defendant is not released from pre-trial detention unless the defendant is discharged to the court administrator, when the judge presides over the execution of a release agreement duly executed by the defendant under the conditions prescribed by the defence judge, or the amount of the guarantee is deposited at the level set by the judge in accordance with ORS 135.230 (definition of ORS 135.230 to 135,290) at 135,290 (sanction by non-compliance with the jurisdiction). (1) If a defendant is released before the judgment, the terms of the release agreement apply in the fact that the defendant: Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version.
Oregon may have more up-to-date or more accurate information. We do not provide any guarantee or guarantee as to the accuracy, completeness or relevance of the information contained in this website or information related to the state website. Check the official sources. (a) to respond to the charge before the competent court on a given day and thereafter, as ordered by the court, until the defendant is removed or sentenced; (d) to meet the other conditions that the court may impose. (2) A defendant may be punished with contempt if the defendant is knowingly: (c) not leaving that state without leave; and (A) the victim asks the court for a waiver; and (B) After hearing the application, the Tribunal finds that the waiver of the condition is in the best interests of the parties and the Community. “Unloaded” refers to the release of the accused when the proceedings are dismissed. State v. Tally, 184 Gold App 715, 57 P3d 592 (2002) (b) Injured an order entered under ORS 135.247.